Since the Khafre SAR Scan Results hit the media in 2025, with their data apparently showing huge columns, spiral staircases and enormous square chambers deep below the Khafre pyramid, and Filippo Biondi, engineer and signal processing researcher for the team having appearances on podcasts such as Joe Rogan and Jesse Michels, there have been growing calls for authorities to excavate at Giza and reveal the findings.
But many people including myself are very skeptical of the results, especially because the study is not peer-reviewed, there hasn’t been many control experiments, the work hasn’t been replicated by independent researchers, and the SAR team are using no detailed knowledge of the Giza geology in their interpretations.
Nobody knows how they are differentiating between solid signals of man-made structures and the natural cavities, fissures, caves and changes in rock type. There also was no discussion of the water table below Giza.
The researchers call it science, Synthetic Aperture Radar Doppler Tomography, so last year I called for them to follow the scientific method and submit their work to a large scientific journal, such as Nature, because that is how you end the backlash from naysayers once and for all.
But recently, my channel was waved away as a debunking channel by Biondi on the Jesse Michels podcast when all I did was give his work a fair overview and then I asked questions, questions that still haven't been answered.
But many people including myself are very skeptical of the results, especially because the study is not peer-reviewed, there hasn’t been many control experiments, the work hasn’t been replicated by independent researchers, and the SAR team are using no detailed knowledge of the Giza geology in their interpretations.
Nobody knows how they are differentiating between solid signals of man-made structures and the natural cavities, fissures, caves and changes in rock type. There also was no discussion of the water table below Giza.
The researchers call it science – Synthetic Aperture Radar Doppler Tomography, so last year I called for them to follow the scientific method and submit their work to a large scientific journal, such as Nature, because that is how you end the backlash from naysayers once and for all.
But recently, my channel was waved away as a debunking channel by Biondi on the Jesse Michels podcast when all I did was give his work a fair overview and then I asked questions, questions that still haven't been answered.